
Law Messenger
Draft amendments to strengthen control over foreign investment in "strategic" assets published
23.04.2025
The Federal Anti-Monopoly Service has drafted amendments to current laws aimed at strengthening control over foreign investments in business entities and assets of strategic importance for national defense and state security in accordance with Law No. 57-FZ of April 29, 2008 "On the Procedure for Making Foreign Investments in Business Entities of Strategic Importance for Ensuring National Defense and State Security".
In addition to amendments to Law No. 57-FZ, the draft amendments also provide for amendments to the following laws:
- Law No. 2395-1 of the Russian Federation of 21 February 1992 "On the Subsoil"
- Law No. 147-FZ of 17 August 1995 "On Natural Monopolies"
- Law No. 160-FZ of 9 July 1999 "On Foreign Investments in the Russian Federation"
- Law No. 135-FZ of 26 July 2006 "On the Protection of Competition"
- Law No. 16-FZ of 9 February 2007 No 16-FZ "On Transport Security"
- Law No. 99-FZ of 4 May 2011 No 99-FZ "On the Licensing of Certain Types of Activities"
In accordance with the explanatory note, the amendments were developed as part of the implementation of the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation approved by Presidential Edict No. 400 of 02.07.2021 and in accordance with the Plan of Legislative Activities of the Government of the Russian Federation for 2025.
As of 22 April 2025, the document is undergoing public consultation on the official portal, regulation.gov.ru (id 154454).
In particular, the planned changes provide for:
- the expansion of the list of activities and property with respect to which related transactions are subject to mandatory prior approval by the state;
- the establishment of additional requirements for the disclosure of information on ultimate beneficiaries and owners of assets.
After the completion of the public consultation, the draft law may be submitted to the State Duma of the Russian Federation for consideration.
Overview of the key changes to Law No 57-FZ
Extension of control to transactions involving property in state or municipal ownership for strategic activities
The draft amendments lay down a requirement for preliminary approval of transactions involving property that is in state or municipal ownership if the property:
- relates to fixed assets that are used (or were previously used) for strategic activities, and
- has not been transferred for use by business entities.
Inclusion in the range of transactions requiring approval of transactions effectively connected with strategic companies
The draft amendments provide that "strategic" companies include not only companies that carry on one of the types of activities classified as such, but other business entities that may potentially carry on such activities owing to the fact that they:
- have licenses or other permits related to such activities;
- have concluded agreements providing for the possibility of participation in strategic activities;
- own property related to fixed production assets that are used (or were previously used) for strategic activities.
New activities of strategic importance
In the field of subsoil use:
- Clause 39.1: Use of a subsoil plot not classified as a plot of federal significance containing recoverable reserves of oil from 50 to 70 million tons, gas from 30 to 50 billion cubic meters, copper from 300 to 500 thousand tons, or gold from 30 to 50 tons, as well as deposits of certain types of rare minerals (uranium, nickel, cobalt, lithium and others);
- Clause 39.1: Use of multiple subsoil plots not classified as federal plots, provided that they are controlled by one person, if their total reserves exceed 70 million tons of oil, or 50 billion cubic meters of gas, or 500 thousand tons of copper, or 50 tons of gold;
- Clause 39.3: Extraction of groundwater used for drinking and domestic water supply in the amount of more than 500 cubic meters per day (except for cases where extraction is carried out for the subsoil user's own production and technological needs).
In the field of fishery:
- Clause 40.2: Aquaculture (fish farming) that is not classified as a type of fishery;
- Clause 40.1: A business entity engaged in the acceptance, processing, transportation, storage and unloading of aquatic biological resources, as well as the production of fish products, if: revenue from these activities is ≥50% of total revenue for the last year; the total book value of the assets of the entity and its business group exceeds 800 million rubles as of the last reporting date.
In addition, the list of types of activities is extended to include production activities that are directly connected with the conduct of any of the activities specified in Article 6 of Law 57-FZ (clause 51). At the same time, the draft law does not contain clarifications as to the scope of those production activities and does not establish criteria for assigning specific types of activities to that category.
New disclosure requirements
When seeking approval for transactions, a foreign investor would be obliged to provide not only information about its own ownership structure, beneficiaries and controlling persons, but also similar information about the alienating party.
In particular, it would be necessary to provide information on indications that the alienating party is under control as defined in accordance with Article 5 of Law No 57-FZ.
In addition, foreign investors would be obliged to disclose information on the ownership of shares (stakes) amounting to 5% or more in relation to companies which carry on activities provided for in clauses 39.1-39.3 of Article 6 of Law 57-FZ (new activities in the field of subsoil use as described above), i.e. which:
- did not previously have the status of strategic entities (for example, on the date of the transaction), but
- are recognized as such under the "new" rules.
This information must be submitted to the Federal Anti-Monopoly Service within 180 days of the date of entry into force of the amendments. Failure to meet this obligation entails the risk of a foreign investor (or business group) being deprived of the right to vote at the general meeting of shareholders/participants in the manner prescribed by part 4.1 of Article 15 of Law No 57-FZ (through the courts). Should that restriction be imposed, it would have effect until the above information is provided.
Recommendations
Given recent instances of the Prosecutor General's Office using Article 169 of the Civil Code to challenge transactions involving assets under the direct or indirect control of ultimate beneficiaries with dual citizenship, it is essential to weigh up the potential risks of questions being raised by state authorities about the history of the acquisition of such assets. As a rule, the above-mentioned claims raised by the Prosecutor General's Office are considered in a closed hearing, and the only details available are from media reports. At the same time, it is evident from available information that in some cases transactions are challenged and the strategic nature of the company is cited as a justification, despite the absence of formal attributes of a company of strategic importance.
In view of the possible strengthening of control over foreign investments within the framework of Law No. 57-FZ, it is advisable to:
- monitor the status of the discussion and adoption of the relevant draft law, including changes that may be made as a result of the public consultation and when it is submitted to the State Duma for consideration, as well as in the process of consideration by the State Duma and the Federation Council;
- conduct a legal analysis of current transactions / assets already acquired to assess the risk of companies or their property being recognized as "strategic" based on the new criteria.
AUTHORS
.jpg)
Natalia Aristova
B1 Partner
Legal Services. Expert in corporate, finance and banking law, sanctions compliance, energy and environmental law
Contact
.jpg)
Iaroslav Solarev
B1 Manager
Legal Services
Contact
OTHER PUBLICATIONS
View all
Non-use trademark cancellation: risks for foreign right holders are beginning to materialize. Part 2
Case law regarding the early termination of trademark protection due to non-use, one example of which is the recent case involving the early termination of protection for a series of trademarks held by the Swedish company Telefonaktiebolaget L. M. Ericsson, is continuing to build in Russia.
11.06.2025
.jpg)
The Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia is preparing a draft decree to increase environmental fee rates
In early June 2025, Kommersant and RBC reported that the Ministry of Natural Resources of Russia was in the process of drafting a government decree proposing increases in the basic rates of the environmental fee (eco-fee) from 2026. The document envisages severalfold increases in eco-fee rates for almost all categories of goods and packaging – depending on the item, rates may go up between 3 and 18 times.
11.06.2025
.jpg)
Overview of the 17th package of EU sanctions
On 20 May 2025, the EU Council adopted the 17th package of sanctions against Russia. The new measures are primarily aimed at the activities of the so-called "shadow fleet" used to transport Russian oil. In particular, 189 vessels have been added to the list of ships banned from entering the ports of EU member states. In addition, a new EU Regulation has been adopted to counter Russia’s destabilizing actions abroad.
26.05.2025

Draft amendments to strengthen control over foreign investment in "strategic" assets published
The Federal Anti-Monopoly Service has drafted amendments to current laws aimed at strengthening control over foreign investments in business entities and assets of strategic importance for national defense and state security in accordance with Law No. 57-FZ of April 29, 2008 "On the Procedure for Making Foreign Investments in Business Entities of Strategic Importance for Ensuring National Defense and State Security".
23.04.2025
.jpg)
Sanctions pressure and prosecution risks: important considerations for Russian companies and their employees
There has recently been an increase in regulatory pressure exerted by the EU in terms of monitoring compliance with European sanctions, including by Russian companies controlled by European entities. This may create additional prosecution risks both for the Russian subsidiaries themselves and, especially, for their employees, including senior executives, who are often forced to take foreign sanctions restrictions into account in their activities.
11.04.2025

Taxis under SPIC rules: new localization requirements
Bill No. 481272-8 (amendments to Federal Law No. 580-FZ “Concerning the Organization of the Transport of Passengers and Baggage by Taxi…”), which proposes to toughen the requirements for vehicles used in taxi services, is about to undergo a second reading. The bill was initially submitted to the State Duma in January 2024 but was later sent back for revision. The official text of the amendments has not been published, but the key provisions were disclosed in press. Below is a summary of the possible key changes and their potential impact on the industry.
28.03.2025

Non-use cancellation of a trademark: risks for foreign rights holders start to materialize
In 2025, the three-year grace period for the non-use of a trademark expires for many foreign right holders which exited the Russian market in 2022. This poses a risk of a non-use cancellation action against such trademarks from companies that continues to operate in Russia. Such precedents are already in place. One of such “fresh” precedents is discussed below.
25.03.2025